good point re: how approximative 1559 is as a redistributor to other tx senders. is there an argument to be made that it's a closer approximation than the status quo (which just pays miners)?
I guess this would assume that miner<>user has less of an intersection than collateral/hodler<>user (...?)
good point re: how approximative 1559 is as a redistributor to other tx senders. is there an argument to be made that it's a closer approximation than the status quo (which just pays miners)?
I guess this would assume that miner<>user has less of an intersection than collateral/hodler<>user (...?)