good point re: how approximative 1559 is as a redistributor to other tx senders. is there an argument to be made that it's a closer approximation than the status quo (which just pays miners)?
I guess this would assume that miner<>user has less of an intersection than collateral/hodler<>user (...?)
Yes, maybe it's more of an argument for "why fees are not due to miners" but less for "why fees are due for x or y category of stakeholders", which doesn't say much aside from punting the question to the specific conditions of Ethereum and how 1559 is deployed.
good point re: how approximative 1559 is as a redistributor to other tx senders. is there an argument to be made that it's a closer approximation than the status quo (which just pays miners)?
I guess this would assume that miner<>user has less of an intersection than collateral/hodler<>user (...?)
Yes, maybe it's more of an argument for "why fees are not due to miners" but less for "why fees are due for x or y category of stakeholders", which doesn't say much aside from punting the question to the specific conditions of Ethereum and how 1559 is deployed.